Language Question
It's been said (although it is likely false) that the Inuit have dozens of words for snow. Many languages have numerous words for family relationships that all get lumped together in English (e.g., we say "aunt", but the Navajo distinguish between a mother's sister and a father's sister.) There are numerous examples of languages that are rich in certain terms; ethnologists and anthropologists use those quirks to draw conclusions about the culture.
What does English have that other languages don't have? What riches are there, hidden in our language that we don't recognize on a daily basis, but which would leap out at us, if we (read: I) were more fluent in other languages?
Mindy, musing about linguistics (and contemplating laundering her new jeans, which have a strange sulfur-ish smell, likely from fabric sizing - the only catch in an otherwise successful shopping trip!)
What does English have that other languages don't have? What riches are there, hidden in our language that we don't recognize on a daily basis, but which would leap out at us, if we (read: I) were more fluent in other languages?
Mindy, musing about linguistics (and contemplating laundering her new jeans, which have a strange sulfur-ish smell, likely from fabric sizing - the only catch in an otherwise successful shopping trip!)
I'm not a linguist, but offhand -- English has really rich linguistic options for talking about food. For example, we have different words for cow vs. beef, and different words for beef vs. veal, and different words for hamburger vs. steak, and so on.
We also have about a zillion different ways to say "intoxicated."
Di
In Mandarin, we distinguish between whether the sister/brother is maternal/paternal and whether the sibling is older or younger than your parent as well. Not to mention the eldest and the youngest are separate as well.
Can't think of anything though.
I'm Sooooo *Not* a linguist, but fascinated by the language.
I found that fascinating.
Something that my 12th grade English teacher gave to the class...
We take English for granted. But if we explore its paradoxes, we find that quicksand can work slowly, boxing rings are square and a guinea pig is neither from Guinea nor is it a pig.
And why is it that writers write but fingers don't fing, grocers don't groce and hammers don't ham? If the plural of tooth is teeth, why isn't the plural of booth beeth? One goose, 2 geese. So one moose, 2 meese... One blouse, 2 blice?
Doesn't it seem crazy that you can make amends but not one amend, that you comb through annals of history but not a single annal? If you have a bunch of odds and ends and get rid of all but one of them, what do you call it?
If teachers taught, why didn't preachers praught? If a vegetarian eats vegetables, what does a humanitarian eat? If you wrote a letter, perhaps you bote your tongue?
Sometimes I think all the English speakers should be committed to an asylum for the verbally insane. In what language do people recite at a play and play at a recital? Ship by truck and send cargo by ship? Have noses that run and feet that smell? Park on driveways and drive on parkways?
How can a "slim chance" and a "fat chance" be the same, while a "wise man" and "wise guy" are opposites? How can overlook and oversee be opposites, while "quite a lot" and "quite a few" are alike? How can the weather be "hot as hell" one day and "cold as hell" another?
Have you noticed that we talk about certain things only when they are absent? Have you ever seen a horseful carriage or a strapful gown? Met a sung hero or experienced requited love? Have you ever run into someone who was combobulated, gruntled, ruly or peccable? And where are all those people who are spring chickens or who would actually hurt a fly?
You have to marvel at the unique lunacy of a language in which your house can burn up as it burns down, in which you fill in a form by filling it out and in which an alarm clock goes off by going on.
English was invented by people, not computers, and it reflects the creativity of the human race (which, of course, isn't a race at all). That is why, when the stars are out, they are visible, but when the lights are out, they are invisible. And why, when I wind up my watch, I start it, but when I wind up this essay, I end it?
Now I know why I flunked my English. It's not my fault, the silly language doesn't quite know whether it's coming or going.
(Anonymous)
I like English's adaptability when making words for new things; we just grab bits and pieces of Latin and Greek and hook 'em together succinctly. German sticks German words for definition of the new thing together into one "new" very long word. And French linguists will twist their language into a pretzel just to make sure that the word for the new thing isn't anything like it is in any other language (especially English).
After "taking" Spanish I and II with #2-Son, I am especially grateful for English having dropped / lost the "gender" from nouns and their accompanying articles, verbs, etc. And it makes life easier that the pronouns-of-respect have disappeared except from some religious areas, too.
Oh, that differentiation between the word for the food and the word for the animal it came from? Thank the snotty Normans who wouldn't be caught dead using the language of the people whose island they thought they must have.
Camera Obscura (http://homepage.mac.com/baroose/iblog/index.html)